What the community is saying about Arknights: Endfield
459 insights | Last updated: 2026-03-13 | Page 2 of 39
Multiple players report a bug where pipes don't appear outside the AIC area during a water draining quest, causing confusion and inefficient solutions. Players are resorting to manual workarounds.
Players notice and praise small details like characters acknowledging camera, Xaihi's judgment animations. These immersion elements generate positive community response.
High engagement on Estella character file discussion. Players appreciate grimdark storytelling through text files rather than cutscenes. Emotional impact praised.
Multiple comments requesting ability to pour liquid xiranite into water bodies to combat blight. Community wants collaborative server-wide events and more factory production capacity.
Strong community demand for ability to save Headhunting Dossier for future use. High engagement indicates this is a frequently requested QoL feature.
Players report Surtr's passive ability is bugged, causing deaths in second stage despite proper builds. High comment engagement suggests widespread issue affecting gameplay.
Massive engagement on post about blight spreading in Wuling river. Players compare to FFXIV 1.0's Dalamud, praise dynamic world changes. Some skepticism about actual progression, but overall enthusiasm for immersive storytelling.
Comments show community bonding over silly in-game moments (bean balloons, Chubby Lung). Players embrace lighthearted content and defend playful behavior as part of game culture.
Community discussing Nature element attackers, noting zero available characters in this category. Players analyzing element balance and anticipating future character releases to fill gaps.
Character art post received highest engagement (3760 score). Strong positive reception to character design, particularly aesthetic elements. Community creating and sharing fan content enthusiastically.
Players debating whether to wait for ticket refresh cycles before pulling on banners. Community discussing optimal resource management with non-carrying pull tickets, showing engagement with gacha economy mechanics.
Community strongly opposes $1.50/roll pricing for limited banners with temporary rolls. Users compare unfavorably to other gacha games and request persistent rolls or better value propositions. The $20 all-rounder pack seen as more reasonable but still suboptimal.